Group search should be OR - not AND #12721
Comments
koppor
added
component: groups
good third issue
good fourth issue
and removed
good third issue
labels
|
Hello @koppor I am Akriti . I would love to work on this issue . Can you Please assigned it to me . |
|
👋 Hey @techaakritisha, looks like you’re eager to work on this issue—great! 🎉 It also looks like you skipped reading our CONTRIBUTING.md, which explains exactly how to participate. No worries, it happens to the best of us. Give it a read, and you’ll discover the ancient wisdom of assigning issues to yourself. Trust me, it’s worth it. 🚀 |
|
/assign-me |
github-actions
bot
added
the
📍 Assigned
|
👋 Hey @techaakritisha, thank you for your interest in this issue! 🎉 We're excited to have you on board. Start by exploring our Contributing guidelines, and don't forget to check out our workspace setup guidelines to get started smoothly. In case you encounter failing tests during development, please check our developer FAQs! Having any questions or issues? Feel free to ask here on GitHub. Need help setting up your local workspace? Join the conversation on JabRef's Gitter chat. And don't hesitate to open a (draft) pull request early on to show the direction it is heading towards. This way, you will receive valuable feedback. Happy coding! 🚀 ⏳ Please note, you will be automatically unassigned if the issue isn't closed within 45 days (by 29 April 2025). A maintainer can also add the "📌 Pinned" label to prevent automatic unassignment. |
Hey, although you are free to give it a go, note that this issue is not intended for newcomers (see the good "fourth" issue label). |
|
@koppor (i) i think we need to be excluded (ii) number of days seems broken |
|
Hey @subhramit @koppor I am working on it . "Please give me some time as this is an good fourth issue. It is taking time to understand it clearly. |
|
unassign-me |
|
/unassign @techaakritisha |
github-actions
bot
removed
the
📍 Assigned
|
/assign-me |
github-actions
bot
added
the
📍 Assigned
|
👋 Hey @Sak-drago, thank you for your interest in this issue! 🎉 We're excited to have you on board. Start by exploring our Contributing guidelines, and don't forget to check out our workspace setup guidelines to get started smoothly. In case you encounter failing tests during development, please check our developer FAQs! Having any questions or issues? Feel free to ask here on GitHub. Need help setting up your local workspace? Join the conversation on JabRef's Gitter chat. And don't hesitate to open a (draft) pull request early on to show the direction it is heading towards. This way, you will receive valuable feedback. Happy coding! 🚀 ⏳ Please note, you will be automatically unassigned if there is not a (draft) pull request within 14 days (by 01 April 2025). |
|
Working on it. Will keep posting updates as ideas or implementations come by. |
@Sak-drago please note as well. Feel free to take it (if you are experienced in this context), or you can start with something simpler. |
|
If any doubts, I will let you or the team know. I have decent lot experience with Java. Let's see how this goes |
Context: JabRef groups - see https://docs.jabref.org/finding-sorting-and-cleaning-entries/groups for a longer explanation.
One can search for groups in the side pane. When entering two group names separated by a space, JabRef should match group strings containing any of these words. (Currently, it requires ALL words to be present)
Task:
Search.g4can be used here, too.Refs #10209 somehow
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: