-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a linear optimization option to Optimize Recoils or Fluence #193
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
tpitkanen
changed the title
Add a linear optimization option to *Optimize Recoils or Fluence*
Add a linear optimization option to Optimize Recoils or Fluence
Sep 8, 2021
tpitkanen
added a commit
to tpitkanen/potku
that referenced
this issue
Oct 27, 2021
- the button doesn't affect optimization yet
8 tasks
First version is implemented, but this is not complete yet. See #261 for remaining tasks. |
tpitkanen
added a commit
to tpitkanen/potku
that referenced
this issue
Mar 30, 2022
- add cleanup option for recoil files in calculate_espe
tpitkanen
added a commit
to tpitkanen/potku
that referenced
this issue
Mar 30, 2022
- this should be better than NSGA-II now - opening the optimization dialog causes a brief flash now for some reason, probably related to the order of operations, or maybe the choose_optimization_method call
This is more complete now, but there are still some major things missing (#262). |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
(Requested by @mlaitin)
The current NSGA-II multi-objective optimization algorithm is too fancy (slow and inaccurate) for optimizing recoils or fluence. A single-objective linear fit algorithm would run faster and probably yield similar results.
Objectives to optimize (simulated vs. measured values):
Different local minimums could be presented for the user to select.
The options for algorithms could be displayed like this:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: