-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add PATCHMEM? #7
Comments
https://archive.org/details/PATCHMEM It's closed source. The author passed away. License unknown. Not sure it it's legally OK to include it. |
On their website they said they are “…[making] it available to anyone who is interested in pursuing further endeavors” and also released the source code. |
Yes I agree this should be added but as an optional feature that is triggered with an argument (such as patcher9x -moreram |
The source code is available here: |
OK, looks like there is a demand for this patch :-) I'll try to add it to some future release. |
I don't want to add to scope creep, but PATCH137 and the SATA patch from rloew are also interesting. Both make changes to esdi_506.pdr |
Related patches from http://lonecrusader.x10host.com/rloew/rloew.html
GPT (needed above 2TB?) read/write support for Win9x from https://github.com/LordOfMice/Tools
|
Will PATCHMEM function be optional? E.g. the rest of patcher9x to still work if there is no PSE support. |
I’d be worried about feature creep. Also, FILE64 has many incompatibilities in my experience. |
A feature I’d like to see is the inclusion of the late Rloew’s PATCHMEM in this program.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: