-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 564
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SpscLinkedQueue#fill#soNext(temp) may be replaced with spNext(next) #293
Labels
Comments
MpscLinkedQueue#fill
|
The redundant fences are potentially costly on ARM processors. PR is welcome :-) |
nitsanw
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 22, 2020
Partial fix to #293, needs more tests added
#299 pull request |
#307 pull request |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Just like an object factory, the oldPNode.soNext(head) can ensure correct construction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: