You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have what I believe to be a burdensome but novel feature request. I propose that the observable dispersion curves computed by Takin be automatically differentiated with respect to the parameters of the spin wave model (exchange coupling, anisotropy, etc). I don't believe the instrument resolution would need to be considered, although both the energy and intensity of the dispersion curve would need to be differentiable. With these two, I believe the gradient of the log likelihood of the data can be computed with respect to the model parameters.
Why this feature would be useful:
Current model-data fits are done using global fit minimization. A gradient w.r.t. the model parameters would allow much better fits to the data. As I understand it, current methods involve fixing some parameters, tuning others, and global minimization searches. A Newton's method search would be much faster I believe.
Fit sensitivity can be then estimated using the Hessian of the data with respect to the model parameters.
My own interests. This would make using gradient based MCMC samples of model parameters possible, as well as making autonomous experimentation methods possible.
The risks and costs of this feature:
This could be completely infeasible and too much work!
Novelty: To my knowledge, no other tool has this capability. This I believe would be a novel and useful advancement.
I know this is a lot of work. I think this is a big risk, hopefully big reward project, so perhaps some other inputs would be useful. Maybe I am the only one that wants this.
Thanks for reading,
Elliott
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Bonjour!
I have what I believe to be a burdensome but novel feature request. I propose that the observable dispersion curves computed by Takin be automatically differentiated with respect to the parameters of the spin wave model (exchange coupling, anisotropy, etc). I don't believe the instrument resolution would need to be considered, although both the energy and intensity of the dispersion curve would need to be differentiable. With these two, I believe the gradient of the log likelihood of the data can be computed with respect to the model parameters.
Why this feature would be useful:
The risks and costs of this feature:
Novelty: To my knowledge, no other tool has this capability. This I believe would be a novel and useful advancement.
I know this is a lot of work. I think this is a big risk, hopefully big reward project, so perhaps some other inputs would be useful. Maybe I am the only one that wants this.
Thanks for reading,
Elliott
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: