Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chibi-scheme: use tarball with stable hash #195790

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lassik
Copy link
Contributor

@lassik lassik commented Oct 28, 2024

  • Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
  • Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
  • Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
  • Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

@lassik
Copy link
Contributor Author

lassik commented Oct 28, 2024

Copy link
Member

@SMillerDev SMillerDev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Downgrading to http and a completely different host seems like a problem. Why change this?

@lassik
Copy link
Contributor Author

lassik commented Oct 30, 2024

The old tarball was auto-generated by GitHub from a Git tag. Those are not guaranteed to have stable hashes.

Chanegd from HTTP to HTTPS.

@ashinn
Copy link

ashinn commented Oct 31, 2024

FWIW made a github release with a stable asset: https://github.com/ashinn/chibi-scheme/releases/download/0.11/chibi-scheme-0.11.0.tgz

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants