Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider making BAG_IN an overload #181

Open
mn200 opened this issue Aug 1, 2014 · 0 comments
Open

Consider making BAG_IN an overload #181

mn200 opened this issue Aug 1, 2014 · 0 comments
Labels
Feature Request Theories

Comments

@mn200
Copy link
Member

mn200 commented Aug 1, 2014

BAG_IN is redundant in the same way that MEM is; we end up proving two sets of theorems: one for BAG_IN and one for SET_OF_BAG.

To be explicit, the overload would be

overload_on("BAG_IN", ``λe b. e IN SET_OF_BAG b``)

Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Feature Request Theories
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mn200