-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
multiruby example: discrepencies in y-position of calibrating crystal #5
Comments
GUI gives very close results to command line. A slight difference is that the GUI results give the grains in the same order in all three cases, while the CLI gives the grains permuted in the composite case. monolithic case, no distortionY-positions are: 0.130, -0.120, -0.113
monolithic case, with distortionY-positions are: 0.081, -0.168, -0.161
composite (8 subpanels) caseY-positions are: 0, -0.250, -0.240
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
There are discrepencies in the y-position of the calibrating crystals in the multiruby example.
The results shown below give the orientation and positions of the same grain given in the three files:
Each file has a section
calibration_crystal
, which contains the fitted orientations and positions of the three crystals in the specimen. Each file has three crystals but the order is not the same in all. Individual crystals can be identified by their orientation, and the orientations are in very close agreement. Likewise, the x- and z-positions are very close, but the y-positions vary by over 100 micrometers.For all three files, the y-position varies across the three cyrstals. In fact, there appears to be a consistent offset. The monolithic with distortion is about 80 um more than the composite, and the monolithic is about 130 more than the composite.
The same thing happens with all three cyrstals:
and
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: