-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Jinja2 variables not accessible in word document properties #389
Comments
domwhewell-sage
changed the title
Jinja variables accessible in word document properties
Jinja variables not accessible in word document properties
Feb 6, 2024
domwhewell-sage
changed the title
Jinja variables not accessible in word document properties
Jinja2 variables not accessible in word document properties
Feb 6, 2024
I hadn't considered looking at document properties. I think that would be a neat addition. If you'd like to submit another PR for it, I'd be happy to accept the feature 😄 Otherwise, I'll make a note to take a look at how it might be done. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The Jinja2 variables don't seem to be accessible in the document properties section. (In MS word select "File" > "Info")
For example:
These variables don't get replaced. Filling out document properties in word has the added benefit of being available to the operating system so in windows you can use the search function.
Describe the solution you'd like
Being able to add the jinja variables into the properties section would be the ideal solution.
Describe alternatives you've considered
There are set properties such as "Authors" where all operators of the project could be automatically added or there is the "Tags" section which is where the project.tags could automatically get put.
Its probably best to leave it up to the user though that way they can fill out as much or as little information as they want in the document properties
Additional context
I have used python-docx before to add document properties so could contribute a PR if you are open to adding this feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: