You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently ProbABEL (v0.4.3) checks whether the IDs in the phenotype and genotype files are in the same order (while reading in the data). We could improve on this be reading in the phenotype data completely first and then reorder the phenotype data according to the genotype data.
My guess is that this is not too expensive in terms of computation time when compared to running several million regressions. Of course, as genotype data may be split in chunks and many chunks run parallel (e.g. using a queue system), this cost increases, as each separate job has to do the order check, and if the data is out-of-order, the reordering.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a 'liftover' of feature request #5677 from the R-forge tracker.
This request is based on the forum post by user Siru at http://forum.genabel.org/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=876.
Currently ProbABEL (v0.4.3) checks whether the IDs in the phenotype and genotype files are in the same order (while reading in the data). We could improve on this be reading in the phenotype data completely first and then reorder the phenotype data according to the genotype data.
My guess is that this is not too expensive in terms of computation time when compared to running several million regressions. Of course, as genotype data may be split in chunks and many chunks run parallel (e.g. using a queue system), this cost increases, as each separate job has to do the order check, and if the data is out-of-order, the reordering.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: