Hide/Remove Projects/Classes/etc. from coverage

[mmmasent]

Installed product versions

• VS 2019 Community
• Extension 1.1.63

Description

Unable to hide or remove coverage reports for unnecessary projects

Steps to recreate

1. Run tests
2. See code coverage report

Current behavior

Summary Code coverage for unit test projects are shown with calculations over entire solution

Expected behavior

Should be a way to hide/remove projects as needed and have coverage calculated only on desired projects fpr summary reporting
i.e. Right click project, select hide from coverage report

Additionally, it'd be good to have the ability to readd projects as desired, if one were to go project by project inside a solution

Side Notes

Awesome extension

[tonyhallett]

Unable to hide or remove coverage reports for unnecessary projects

The Exclude project element or Fine Code Coverage option is there for this reason. You can apply an exclusion attribute in a project as well.

Right click project, select hide from coverage report

We could do that but I don't think that it would be silent.

Additionally, it'd be good to have the ability to readd projects as desired, if one were to go project by project inside a solution

Are you thinking of an option - filter report by selected project. Then dependent upon the selected project in solution explorer we filter to only show that filter ?

[mmmasent]

I understand fine code coverage is not ReSharper, but I am coming from a ReSharper background.

When you run code coverage with ReSharper, it also includes test projects in the code coverage, but you can exclude tests from the summary without needing an attribute of any kind. You can simply right click and click remove.

A filter of some kind would achieve what I am thinking of as well.

[tonyhallett]

You can exclude test projects with IncludeTestAssembly as a global visual studio option or on a project basis.

[wdspider]

Is there a way to get Fine Code Coverage to use the include/exclude settings I've already defined within my *.runsettings file instead of requiring them to be re-setup within Fine Code Coverage vs options?

[Nordes]

I simply use the [ExcludeFromCodeCoverage] over a class or method. If anyone was wondering how to do in C#.

{
	[ExcludeFromCodeCoverage] // <== this line
	public class Program
	{
		public static void Main(string[] args)
		{
			CreateHostBuilder(args).Build().Run();
		}

		public static IHostBuilder CreateHostBuilder(string[] args) =>
			Host.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)
				.ConfigureWebHostDefaults(webBuilder =>
				{
					webBuilder.UseStartup<Startup>();
				});
	}
}

[craigktreasure]

This appears to work at the class level, but not for methods. Methods marked with the ExcludeFromCodeCoverage attribute aren't excluded from the code coverage calculation.

[tonyhallett]

@craigktreasure
Is this only when using ms code coverage ?

[craigktreasure]

Hmmm...good question. Not sure. I have RunMsCodeCoverage set to No in the FCC settings.

[tonyhallett]

@craigktreasure
ExcludeFromCodeCoverage should work on methods. Do you have a repo that I can look at ?

[craigktreasure]

Not that I can quickly share. To be clear, what i'm seeing is that the Fine Code Coverage window doesn't properly reflect excluded methods. For that matter, it's the same for assemblies marked with ExcludeFromCodeCoverage.

The reports I generate using Coverlet are correct. It's just the Fine Code Coverage window that doesn't reflect properly.