You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The affected suites are ethip4ipsec1000tnlsw-fixtnlip-ip4base-policy-flow-dir-aes256gcm and ethip4ipsec1000tnlsw-fixtnlip-ip4base-policy-flow-rss-aes256gcm, both failing [0] due to retval -1 from flow_enable API call, which means VNET_FLOW_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED.
I bet only new-ish Intel NICs support such hardware flows, but we should confirm that before deleting those tests from jobspecs.
Note that similarly named suites such as ethip4ipsec10000tnlsw-ip4base-policy-flow-cache-aes256gcm do not actually rely on hardware flows, so they are passing also on Mellanox NICs.
vrpolak (Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:03:34 +0000): Using experiments [2] in VPP I convinced myself the NIC really does not offer those capabilities (in ways DPDK libraries could expose to VPP dpdk plugin).
vrpolak (Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:00:38 +0000): Those tests were failing [1] also previously in rls2406, but the fails were misidentified, probably as a different ipsec policy issue such as CSIT-1938.
Using experiments [2] in VPP I convinced myself the NIC really does not offer those capabilities (in ways DPDK libraries could expose to VPP dpdk plugin).
Those tests were failing [1] also previously in rls2406, but the fails were misidentified, probably as a different ipsec policy issue such as CSIT-1938.
Description
The affected suites are ethip4ipsec1000tnlsw-fixtnlip-ip4base-policy-flow-dir-aes256gcm and ethip4ipsec1000tnlsw-fixtnlip-ip4base-policy-flow-rss-aes256gcm, both failing [0] due to retval -1 from flow_enable API call, which means VNET_FLOW_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED.
I bet only new-ish Intel NICs support such hardware flows, but we should confirm that before deleting those tests from jobspecs.
Note that similarly named suites such as ethip4ipsec10000tnlsw-ip4base-policy-flow-cache-aes256gcm do not actually rely on hardware flows, so they are passing also on Mellanox NICs.
[0] https://s3-logs.fd.io/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/csit-vpp-perf-report-coverage-2410-3na-spr/33/log.html.gz#s1-s1-s1-s1-s2-t1-k2-k9
Assignee
Unassigned
Reporter
Vratko Polak
Comments
[2] 41875: experiment: distinguish flow enable errors | https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/41875
[1] https://s3-logs.fd.io/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/csit-vpp-perf-report-coverage-2406-3na-spr/6/log.html.gz#s1-s1-s1-s1-s2-t1-k2-k9
Original issue: https://jira.fd.io/browse/CSIT-1979
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: