Skip to content

Conversation

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor

@daledah daledah commented Nov 3, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #72737
PROPOSAL: #72737 (comment)

Tests

Preconditions:
Have one workspace with the Expensify card and Accounting features enabled.
The Expensify card has set up a business bank account.
An accounting system has been set up in the workspace.

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to workspace settings > Accounting > Card reconciliation
  3. Go to offline mode
  4. Click on the Continuous Reconciliation toggle
  5. Verify that: The Continuous Reconciliation toggle is greyed when clicking offline.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native android
Android: mWeb Chrome android-mweb
iOS: Native ios
iOS: mWeb Safari ios-mweb
MacOS: Chrome / Safari web
MacOS: Desktop desktop

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/ONYXKEYS.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/actions/Card.ts 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/pages/workspace/withPolicyConnections.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...counting/reconciliation/CardReconciliationPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...e/expensifyCard/WorkspaceSettlementAccountPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 180 files with indirect coverage changes

@daledah daledah marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2025 07:57
@daledah daledah requested a review from a team as a code owner November 3, 2025 07:57
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from jayeshmangwani November 3, 2025 07:57
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 3, 2025

@jayeshmangwani Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team November 3, 2025 07:57
@daledah daledah requested a review from a team as a code owner November 4, 2025 16:46
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from heyjennahay and removed request for a team November 4, 2025 16:46
@jayeshmangwani
Copy link
Contributor

@daledah, if the Card reconciliation feature is disabled on 1 tab and we enable it from another tab, the change doesn’t reflect on the first tab. However, it’s working fine on the staging.

Card.reconciliation.mov

heyjennahay
heyjennahay previously approved these changes Nov 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@heyjennahay heyjennahay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Product review LGTM

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Nov 7, 2025

bug-resize.mp4

@jayeshmangwani i can reproduce this bug on staging

@jayeshmangwani
Copy link
Contributor

@daledah You’re trying to change it from the dev. Try testing it in both staging app, open the staging app in both tabs.

@jayeshmangwani
Copy link
Contributor

@daledah , I’m facing an issue on mWeb Chrome, can you please confirm if it’s happening for you too, or if it’s just my emulator?

Steps:

  1. Go to Continuous Reconciliation and check the current value of the toggle.
  2. Go to Troubleshoot and disable the network.
  3. Go to Continuous Reconciliation page and toggle Continuous Reconciliation.
  4. Go back to Troubleshoot and enable the network again.
  5. Return to Accounting , the page gets stuck on loading.
mweb-chrome-bug.mov

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Nov 11, 2025

i'll try to give an update soon

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Nov 13, 2025

@daledah You’re trying to change it from the dev. Try testing it in both staging app, open the staging app in both tabs.

@jayeshmangwani i still can't reproduce this bug

Screen.Recording.2025-11-13.at.15.20.22.mov

@jayeshmangwani
Copy link
Contributor

@daledah Thats fine, I’m too unable to reproduce the issue now when testing in the same environment. Could you please check and confirm whether this bug #74064 (comment) is reproducing for you?

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Nov 13, 2025

Could you please check and confirm whether this bug #74064 (comment) is reproducing for you?

@jayeshmangwani sure, I can reproduce this bug #74064 (comment) and am trying to find a solution for it

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Nov 13, 2025

@jayeshmangwani Can you reproduce this bug on the main branch? I’ve tried several times, but it only works intermittently.

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Nov 19, 2025

friendly bump here @jayeshmangwani

@jayeshmangwani
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry @daledah, I missed your ping. I’m able to reproduce the issue on our PR only, not on the main branch

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Nov 26, 2025

@jayeshmangwani i fixed this bug

@jayeshmangwani
Copy link
Contributor

@daledah Please fix the ESLint here.

// When the accounting feature is not enabled, or if the connections data already exists,
// there is no need to fetch the connections data.
if (!isConnectionDataFetchNeeded || !props.policy?.id) {
setIsFetchingData(false);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@daledah , why do we need to add setIsFetchingData here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jayeshmangwani isFetchingData wasn't reset when the conditions changed (going offline or data already fetched) and the API call completed => the page stuck showing a loading indicator

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants