Quotation mark style is too strict

[Zeitsperre]

Just noticed this on a few of my failing builds today:

DOCTEST TRACEBACK
Expected:
    "La moyenne annuelle est faite sur un échantillon mensuel"

Got:
    'La moyenne annuelle est faite sur un échantillon mensuel'

Repr Difference:
    got  = "'La moyenne annuelle est faite sur un échantillon mensuel'"
    want = '"La moyenne annuelle est faite sur un échantillon mensuel"'

Poking around, this seems to also be an issue in stdlib doctest. Any potential to relax this level of scrutiny on strings?

[Erotemic]

You can submit a PR to the checker.py file where fuzzy matching happens as long as it is an option that is disabled by default.

We can talk about what the default state should be, but I want to preserve backwards compatibility within the remainder of the 0.x series. Note that any fuzzy matching does break cases where the string is ambiguous, so there are trade-offs to enabling fuzzy matching by default.

Or you can use the existing ... auto-enabled fuzzy match syntax in place of your quotes.

[Zeitsperre]

Thanks for the quick response. We may need to use the work-around for now, but would really like to see a way (flag?) for easing the rules on string quotations.

I can look into how difficult this would be for me to submit a PR, but it'll have to be in my free time. Please keep this issue open for the time being. Cheers.