You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description:
I've been attempting de novo assembly method of the demo data. However, with each attempt, I consistently obtain a result that is significantly longer in length than the original plasmid and the results are unstable each time.
I have also checked the demo results you provided. They are also longer than expected. For example, the result for barcode 1 should be 7604, but it's 15,633 using de novo assembly method.
Does anyone have a solution or suggestions for this issue? I'd greatly appreciate any help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This automatic identification is not always successful. This "duplication" happens when reads are derived from a circular sequence; putting together these reads results in an assembled sequence twice the length of the original.
Try and align the first half of your assembly against the second half to see if that's the case (the approximately double length suggests that yes).
This automatic identification is not always successful. This "duplication" happens when reads are derived from a circular sequence; putting together these reads results in an assembled sequence twice the length of the original.
Try and align the first half of your assembly against the second half to see if that's the case (the approximately double length suggests that yes).
Description:
I've been attempting de novo assembly method of the demo data. However, with each attempt, I consistently obtain a result that is significantly longer in length than the original plasmid and the results are unstable each time.
I have also checked the demo results you provided. They are also longer than expected. For example, the result for barcode 1 should be 7604, but it's 15,633 using de novo assembly method.
Does anyone have a solution or suggestions for this issue? I'd greatly appreciate any help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: