Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE] Accomplishing "No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration." with multiple resources impossible #292

Closed
3 tasks done
scotttyso opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@scotttyso
Copy link

scotttyso commented Sep 13, 2024

Bug Report Checklist

  • Have you provided a full/minimal configuration to reproduce the issue?
  • Have you [tested with the latest master] to confirm the issue still exists?
  • Have you provided the terraform console logs with environment variable set to TF_LOG=trace?
Description

I have multiple customers that are making mistakes in their infrastructure with Intersight because they can never get to a plan where the plan does not state there are changes to several resources. And because the plan is never clean they are missing when policies are accidently removed from the policy_bucket of profiles and or other policies that they miss because the output of a plan is 100's to 1,000's of lines long.

We really appreciate the recent work that is being done to the provider, but these have been asks for a long time and really need to be addressed to provide a better experience for our customers.

All of the above issues are inter-related to the goal of being able to get to a state of No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration. . Accomplishing this will help customers in being able to detect changes more efficiently, versus what is happening today.

Terraform-provider-intersight version

any version of the provider including the latest release 1.0.55

Configuration file
Actual output (Attach screenshots if applicable)
Related issues/PRs
Suggest a fix
@scotttyso
Copy link
Author

As everything except #291 has been solved I think this one can be closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant