Skip to content

Stored XSS via Person Property Assignment Leading to Admin Session Hijacking

High
DawoudIO published GHSA-fcw7-mmfh-7vjm Dec 17, 2025

Package

churchcrm/churchcrm

Affected versions

<= 6.4.0

Patched versions

6.5.3

Description

Summary

A critical privilege escalation vulnerability exists in ChurchCRM version 6.3.0 and earlier. An authenticated user with specific mid-level permissions ("Edit Records" and "Manage Properties and Classifications") can inject a persistent Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) payload into an administrator's profile. The payload executes when the administrator views their own profile page, allowing the attacker to hijack the administrator's session, perform administrative actions, and achieve a full account takeover.

This vulnerability is a combination of two separate flaws: an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) that allows any user to view any other user's profile, and a Broken Access Control vulnerability that allows a user with general edit permissions to modify any other user's record properties.

Details

The attack chain is as follows:

  1. IDOR in PersonView.php: There is no authorization check at the beginning of PersonView.php. Any authenticated user can view the profile page of any other user (e.g., PersonView.php?PersonID=1 for the admin) simply by knowing their ID.

  2. Broken Access Control in PropertyAssign.php: The "Assign a New Property" functionality, accessible from another user's PersonView.php page, directs the user to PropertyAssign.php. This script correctly checks if the user has the general isEditRecordsEnabled() permission, but it fails to perform an object-level authorization check to verify if the user is allowed to edit the specific PersonID passed in the URL. This allows a user with "Edit Records" to modify properties of any person in the system, including an administrator.

  3. Stored XSS Vector: An attacker can leverage these two flaws to navigate to the administrator's profile page and use the "Assign a New Property" form to save a malicious XSS payload to the administrator's record. The Value field for text-based properties is not properly sanitized on input (only strip_tags is applied, which does not remove event handlers) and is not encoded on output, leading to Stored XSS.

    • Input Handling (src/PropertyAssign.php): Saves the property value after only applying strip_tags(), which allows event handler attributes like onerror.
    • Vulnerable Output Sink (src/PersonView.php): Renders the stored property value directly into the HTML without htmlspecialchars(), causing the payload to execute.
      // src/PersonView.php, line ~722
      <td><?= $r2p_Value ?></td> // Vulnerable: Raw output

PoC

This Proof of Concept demonstrates how a user with specific mid-level permissions can inject a Stored XSS payload into the main administrator's profile.

Prerequisites:

  • An attacker has an account with two specific permissions enabled:
    1. Edit Records
    2. Manage Properties and Classifications

Scenario:

  1. Login as Attacker: Log in as the user with the permissions listed above.
image
  1. Target the Administrator: Navigate directly to the administrator's profile page, which is typically PersonID=1.
    http://localhost:8101/PersonView.php?PersonID=1
    
    (Access is granted due to the IDOR in PersonView.php).
image
  1. Inject Payload:
    • On the administrator's profile page, scroll down to the Assigned Properties tab.
    • In the "Assign a New Property" form, select the text-based property e.g. ("Test"). (The form is visible due to the "Edit Records" permission).
    • In the Value textarea that appears, enter the following XSS payload:
      <img src=x onerror=alert('XSS_on_ADMIN_Profile')>
    • Click the "Assign" button. The payload is now stored on the administrator's record. (The assignment is possible due to the Broken Access Control in PropertyAssign.php).
image image
  1. Trigger the Attack:
    • The attacker can now wait for the administrator to log in and view their own profile.
    • When the administrator navigates to their own profile page (PersonView.php?PersonID=1), the payload will execute immediately, and an alert box will appear. The attacker could use a more advanced payload to steal the administrator's session cookie.
image image

Impact

This is a critical privilege escalation vulnerability. It allows a user with specific, elevated (but non-admin) permissions to gain full control over an administrator's account. By hijacking the admin's session, the attacker can perform any action available to an administrator, including creating new admin accounts, deleting data, and potentially chaining this with other vulnerabilities to achieve full server compromise.

Attribution

Reported by: Łukasz Rybak

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required Low
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity None
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

CVE ID

CVE-2025-67875

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Learn more on MITRE.

Credits