You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, thank you for your excellent work! I recently attempted to reproduce your results on the PoseBusters dataset but was unable to achieve the reported performance. I modified the following files to use the PoseBusters dataset (428 cases) as input. Specifically, for the ligand, I directly used the reference structure (ending with _ligand.sdf) provided in the PoseBusters set:
I also adjusted some file paths in SurfDock/bash_scripts/test_scripts/eval_samples.sh before running the evaluation. However, the results I obtained were quite abnormal. The percentage of top-1 RMSDs below 2 Å was only 39.02%, and the top-1 RMSDs for individual cases fluctuated significantly, ranging from 0.1943 to 76,562,226.4198.
Could you please inform me about any potential mistakes I might have made during this process? Alternatively, could you provide the code and scripts you used for this evaluation? I would greatly appreciate your guidance. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, thank you for your excellent work! I recently attempted to reproduce your results on the PoseBusters dataset but was unable to achieve the reported performance. I modified the following files to use the PoseBusters dataset (428 cases) as input. Specifically, for the ligand, I directly used the reference structure (ending with _ligand.sdf) provided in the PoseBusters set:
I also adjusted some file paths in SurfDock/bash_scripts/test_scripts/eval_samples.sh before running the evaluation. However, the results I obtained were quite abnormal. The percentage of top-1 RMSDs below 2 Å was only 39.02%, and the top-1 RMSDs for individual cases fluctuated significantly, ranging from 0.1943 to 76,562,226.4198.
Could you please inform me about any potential mistakes I might have made during this process? Alternatively, could you provide the code and scripts you used for this evaluation? I would greatly appreciate your guidance. Thank you!
Sorry for the late reply, could you please provide the details of the test script? This way I can better reproduce your problem and give advice!
Hello, thank you for your excellent work! I recently attempted to reproduce your results on the PoseBusters dataset but was unable to achieve the reported performance. I modified the following files to use the PoseBusters dataset (428 cases) as input. Specifically, for the ligand, I directly used the reference structure (ending with
_ligand.sdf
) provided in the PoseBusters set:SurfDock/comp_surface/prepare_target/computeTargetMesh_test_samples.py
SurfDock/inference_utils/construct_csv_input.py
I also adjusted some file paths in
SurfDock/bash_scripts/test_scripts/eval_samples.sh
before running the evaluation. However, the results I obtained were quite abnormal. The percentage of top-1 RMSDs below 2 Å was only 39.02%, and the top-1 RMSDs for individual cases fluctuated significantly, ranging from 0.1943 to 76,562,226.4198.Could you please inform me about any potential mistakes I might have made during this process? Alternatively, could you provide the code and scripts you used for this evaluation? I would greatly appreciate your guidance. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: