We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hello, in Debian we are getting an interesting test failure when running the TCGAbiolinks version 2.32.0 on a ppc64el architecture system.
This isn't a new failure, we've seen it since at least version 2.16.0, but we need to decide to either skip it or fix it.
Thanks for looking into this and please let us know if you have an idea for a fix, or if you suggest skipping that test on ppc64el.
240s ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ 240s ── Failure ('test-analyse.R:153:9'): Results of TCGAanalyze_DEA inverting groups changes signal and order of the signals are right ── 240s dataDEGs$logFC not equal to -1 * dataDEGs.inv$logFC. 240s 8/15396 mismatches (average diff: 0.81) 240s [7378] 0.638 - -0.634 == 1.272 240s [7379] -0.634 - 0.638 == -1.272 240s [9519] -0.429 - 0.429 == -0.858 240s [9520] 0.429 - -0.429 == 0.858 240s [11506] 0.276 - -0.274 == 0.550 240s [11507] -0.274 - 0.276 == -0.550 240s [11525] 0.279 - -0.279 == 0.558 240s [11526] -0.279 - 0.279 == -0.558
https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-bioc-tcgabiolinks/testing/ppc64el/51493351/
a Dockerfile to reproduce, I named it r-bioc-tcgabiolinks.Dockerfile
r-bioc-tcgabiolinks.Dockerfile
FROM docker.io/debian:sid-slim WORKDIR /build RUN apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade -y \ && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends \ curl \ devscripts \ debian-keyring \ r-bioc-tcgabiolinks \ pkg-r-autopkgtest \ r-cran-jpeg \ r-cran-png \ r-bioc-biocstyle \ r-cran-rmarkdown \ r-cran-devtools \ r-cran-parmigene \ r-bioc-biobase \ r-bioc-affy \ r-cran-testthat \ r-bioc-annotationhub \ r-bioc-experimenthub \ r-cran-seurat \ r-bioc-complexheatmap \ r-cran-circlize \ r-bioc-consensusclusterplus \ r-cran-igraph \ r-bioc-limma \ r-bioc-edger \ r-bioc-sva \ r-bioc-edaseq \ r-cran-survminer \ r-bioc-genefilter \ r-cran-gridextra \ r-cran-survival \ r-cran-doparallel \ r-cran-ggrepel \ r-cran-scales \ r-cran-dt RUN dget https://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/r/r-bioc-tcgabiolinks/r-bioc-tcgabiolinks_2.32.0+dfsg-1.dsc WORKDIR /build/r-bioc-tcgabiolinks-2.32.0+dfsg RUN /usr/share/dh-r/pkg-r-autopkgtest
Change to an empty directory and run podman build -f ../r-bioc-tcgabiolinks.Dockerfile --platform linux/ppc64le .
podman build -f ../r-bioc-tcgabiolinks.Dockerfile --platform linux/ppc64le .
Of course docker build … also works.
docker build …
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hello, in Debian we are getting an interesting test failure when running the TCGAbiolinks version 2.32.0 on a ppc64el architecture system.
This isn't a new failure, we've seen it since at least version 2.16.0, but we need to decide to either skip it or fix it.
Thanks for looking into this and please let us know if you have an idea for a fix, or if you suggest skipping that test on ppc64el.
https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-bioc-tcgabiolinks/testing/ppc64el/51493351/
a Dockerfile to reproduce, I named it
r-bioc-tcgabiolinks.Dockerfile
Change to an empty directory and run
podman build -f ../r-bioc-tcgabiolinks.Dockerfile --platform linux/ppc64le .
Of course
docker build …
also works.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: