Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: Elevation and Depth/Height #175

Open
dschristianson opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Question: Elevation and Depth/Height #175

dschristianson opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@dschristianson
Copy link
Contributor

Unclear how to handle the following elevation + depth/height cases:

Feature is a point at a given height or depth from the ground surface.

  1. Elevation is reported as ground surface. Height / depth of the feature is also reported relative to ground surface.
  2. Elevation is reported as the absolute location of the feature. Height / depth of the feature is also reported relative to the ground surface.

We have been implementing height / depth in both cases as a representative coordinate in the plugins thus far.

Is elevation in case 1 a representative coordinate and in case 2 it is absolute?

We should probably add some documentation on how to use / interpret these location fields in the data model.

@charuleka
Copy link

charuleka commented Sep 15, 2023 via email

@dschristianson
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's about how to report elevation when the point is not at the ground surface. Data sources may treat their location information differently as in the cases as described above. Assume there is a reference for the depth / height value.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants