Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rsync error for remote dispatcher #1872

Open
sandipde opened this issue Dec 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Rsync error for remote dispatcher #1872

sandipde opened this issue Dec 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working priority / medium One of the priorities in a month

Comments

@sandipde
Copy link

sandipde commented Dec 2, 2023

Environment

  • latest dev version:
  • 3.8:
  • ubuntu:

What is happening?

if self.private_key_path and not os.path.exists(self.private_key_path):

at present it is checked for the key file in present system. However for a centrally managed dispatcher server, which runs and syncs the files in that central server, user need to provide key file path in the remote server to make it work. At present this checks raise an error, commenting out this check make it work perfectly.

How can we reproduce the issue?

self explanatory

What should happen?

should work if the logic is fixed.

Any suggestions?

Disable this check or provide an option to override. We might just want to provide an warning rather than error in this case. ALternate proposal could be to make a remote_sync class which behaves like the logic executors use.

@sandipde sandipde added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 2, 2023
@jimmylism jimmylism added the priority / low Not currently a priority label Dec 15, 2023
@santoshkumarradha santoshkumarradha added priority / medium One of the priorities in a month and removed priority / low Not currently a priority labels Dec 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working priority / medium One of the priorities in a month
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants