You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@AnneSchoenauer I think the downside of the link you shared is that this would require to make separate columns for each benchmark (i.e. scenarios for sector_profile and the other benchmarks for emission_profile). Right now, we have it all in the long format instead of wide format. This then already relates to your comment here
For the company view - I noticed that it is super important when doing econemtric that we need not a long but a wide view. Could we create both? @Tilmon what do you think? I also think that for some plots we need wide view so maybe good to have the view that is best compatible for further analysis? @Tilmon what do you think?
@AnneSchoenauer Providing both to banks might be a bit of an overkill BUT we could provide code to modify datasets to wide format AND join all company-level results together and all product-level results? I assume that's possible and would also solve the "simplifying" question you raised above.
Next step is to decide on a view. Also we need to understand on how to view the transition risk score calculated in ticket #650.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Tilmon I created this ticket as a placeholder to discuss one more time the view of the output files. This follows those discussions here.
Re simplification & wide vs long format
I think we should think about simplifying it. There are a lot of double information and maybe would be great to have only one file similar to this ING here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rRUBpeXfj1w-paAX0Cono7RslZX_kzoujYE1E7XdnaM/edit#gid=1842238901 @Tilmon what do you think?
@AnneSchoenauer I think the downside of the link you shared is that this would require to make separate columns for each benchmark (i.e. scenarios for sector_profile and the other benchmarks for emission_profile). Right now, we have it all in the long format instead of wide format. This then already relates to your comment here
For the company view - I noticed that it is super important when doing econemtric that we need not a long but a wide view. Could we create both? @Tilmon what do you think? I also think that for some plots we need wide view so maybe good to have the view that is best compatible for further analysis? @Tilmon what do you think?
@AnneSchoenauer Providing both to banks might be a bit of an overkill BUT we could provide code to modify datasets to wide format AND join all company-level results together and all product-level results? I assume that's possible and would also solve the "simplifying" question you raised above.
Next step is to decide on a view. Also we need to understand on how to view the transition risk score calculated in ticket #650.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: