|
1 | | -The "emissions profile" measures the transition risk on the product-level of a |
2 | | -company. The indicator is expressed in the percentage of all products that are |
3 | | -at high risk, medium risk or low risk due to the products' relative greenhouse |
4 | | -gas (GHG) emissions. The assessment is first performed on a product-level and |
5 | | -can then be aggregated to the company-level. |
| 1 | +The "emissions profile" measures the absolute GHG emissions of a product in |
| 2 | +comparison to a chosen benchmark of products. The assessment is first performed |
| 3 | +on a product-level and can then be aggregated to the company-level. The profile |
| 4 | +is expressed as the share of a company's products that are in a "high", |
| 5 | +"medium", or "low" emission profile category, based on the comparison to the |
| 6 | +benchmark. A higher emission profile indicates a larger impact on climate change |
| 7 | +compared to the benchmark and can therefore also be interpreted as one climate |
| 8 | +risk component to assess products, companies, or loan portfolios. |
6 | 9 |
|
7 | | -The "emissions profile" measures the relative GHG emissions per product. As a |
8 | | -default option, each product is compared to the GHG emissions of every other |
9 | | -product. Products with higher GHG emissions are considered to have a higher |
10 | | -emission profile and hence also face a higher climate risk. |
| 10 | +```{r include=FALSE} |
| 11 | +bm <- tiltIndicator:::flat_benchmarks(tiltIndicator:::example_products()) |
| 12 | +bm <- paste0("`", bm, "`") |
| 13 | +``` |
11 | 14 |
|
12 | | -After identifying the GHG emissions for each product, the products are ranked |
13 | | -according to their carbon footprint. The ranking method is explained in more |
14 | | -detail in the |
15 | | -[Thresholds](https://2degreesinvesting.github.io/tiltIndicator/articles/tiltIndicator.html#thresholds) |
16 | | -section. In short, products with relatively low GHG emissions are assigned to |
17 | | -the category "low", products with relatively high GHG emissions to the category |
18 | | -"high" and the products in between to the category "medium". |
| 15 | +The "emission profile" is calculated in these steps: |
19 | 16 |
|
20 | | -Note that for the ranking and categorization, we apply different benchmarks. |
21 | | -Products are compared to (i) all other products, to (ii) products within the |
22 | | -same tilt sector, to (iii) products within the same ISIC 4 digit sector, to (iv) |
23 | | -products measured in the same unit, and a combination of (iv) with either (i), |
24 | | -(ii) or (iii). |
| 17 | +* The relative GHG emissions per product are collected from a |
| 18 | +Life-Cycle-Analysis (LCA) database by matching the products from our company |
| 19 | +dataset to the products from the LCA dataset. |
| 20 | +* All products are ranked according to their GHG emissions. |
| 21 | +* The products are grouped by the following benchmarks: |
| 22 | + 1. `r bm[[1]]`: All products. |
| 23 | + 1. `r bm[[2]]`: All products within the same ISIC 4 digit code (example: 0112 Growing of rice). |
| 24 | + 1. `r bm[[3]]`: All products within the same tilt sector (example: agriculture). |
| 25 | + 1. `r bm[[4]]`: All products with the same unit (example: kg). |
| 26 | + 1. `r bm[[5]]`: All products with the same unit within the same ISIC 4 digit section (example: kg + 0112 Growing of rice). |
| 27 | + 1. `r bm[[6]]`: All products with the same unit within the same tilt sector (example: kg + agriculture). |
| 28 | +* For each benchmark, products are assigned to the emission profile category |
| 29 | +"low", "medium" or "high", depending on the GHG emissions arising from their |
| 30 | +production process in comparison to all other products within the same |
| 31 | +benchmark. For the assignment of the three categories, thresholds are used. |
| 32 | +Please find more information about the thresholds in the |
| 33 | +[Thresholds](https://2degreesinvesting.github.io/tiltIndicator/articles/tiltIndicator.html#thresholds) |
| 34 | +section. |
25 | 35 |
|
26 | 36 | For the company-level results, we aggregate all products from the same category |
27 | | -and set them in relation to all products that the company produces. We derive |
28 | | -the "emissions profile", which is expressed as the share of products per |
29 | | -category for each company. |
30 | | - |
31 | | -Finally, the indicator provides the share of products with "low", "medium", or |
32 | | -"high" relative GHG emissions per company. |
| 37 | +and benchmark and set them in relation to all products that the company |
| 38 | +produces. The company-level results are expressed as the company's share of |
| 39 | +products per category "low", "medium", and "high" in comparison to each |
| 40 | +benchmark. |
33 | 41 |
|
34 | 42 | The output of this indicator contains the following: |
35 | 43 |
|
|
0 commit comments